Kelsee Martin
Nov, 8, 2012
Eng 3029-01
Short Analysis Project Draft
There are a lot of different reactions from people who have read Shaggy
Dog
Stories and they are popular among many. Some folks can
connect to the stories and
others cannot. A Shaggy Dog Story is a long, drawn-out
anecdote ending with an absurd
or anticlimactic punchline (thefreedictionary.com).
I
am interested in studying what makes a Shaggy Dog Story funny and what
makes one not. After doing thorough research, I have found
that a person’s background,
age, and level of education have much to do with why a
person would find Shaggy Dog
Stories to be funny or not.There were five Shaggy Dog
stories that were handed out in
class for me and other fellow classmates to read. After
observing them all, we had to rank
them as the first one being the funniest and the fifth one
being the least funny. One of the
SDS is about a snake called Nate. The original punchline is
“Better Nate than Never” but
The traditional punchline is “Better late than never”. The
next one is about friars. The
punchline listed is “only Hugh can prevent florist friars”
and the traditional punchline
is “only you can prevent forest fires”. Third is an SDS
about a giant panda that escaped
from a New York
zoo. The original punchline said “Giant panda, lives in China , eats
shoots and leaves”. There is a book entitled “Eats Shoots
and Leaves”. The fourth SDS
is about Robinson Crusoe. Its punchline stated “Thank Friday
it’s God!” and the actual
phrase is “Thank God it’s Friday”. The last SDS is about
chess players. The punchline
is “it’s chess nuts boasting by an open foyer”. The
traditional punchline is “chess nuts
roasting by an open fire”.
By looking at the class’s blog from
September 18th, I observed the rankings
that were given.
|
Connection to the quote
|
Connection to experience
|
Panda
|
*
|
H
|
Friday
|
H
|
H
|
Nate
|
M
|
N
|
Friars
|
N
|
N
|
Chess
|
N
|
N
|
*You don’t have to be familiar with the quote because the
panda explains the connection
in the joke itself.
The jokes the class found the funniest have more or stronger
features associated with
being funny.
The codes/categories I will use to find out
why the class believed the SDS
about the Panda and Robinson Crusoe are funniest are
connected values, connected
usage, connected activity, and simple jokes.
Some of the students found the SDS about the panda to be one of the
funniest because they connected to it in some way. Some have
read the book “Eats
Shoots and Leaves” and after reading the SDS, have found the
punchline to be funny.
The SDS about Robinson Crusoe was funny as well because most
of the class had a
connection. A few classmates said that they often used the
punchline “Thank God it’s
Friday” and they also value it because in reality they love
when Friday arrives.
Many of the classmates believed that the SDS about Nate was in between.
Not many used the punchline “Better late than never” but
have heard it from somewhere
before. The SDS about the chess players was one of the least
funny stories. Some of the
class said that they knew what the actual punchline of it
was but found it to be a little
boring. Hardly any of the class had any connection to it but
someone did say that they
found little connection because they have sang the song “Chestnuts
roasting by an open
fire” and they also enjoy Christmas time. The SDS about
friars was one of the least funny
as well. All of the class understood the punchline and had heard
it before but did not find
any connection to it.
In
my opinion, the SDS about Robinson Crusoe was the funniest. I have a
close connection with it because I always use the phrase and
I value Friday because it is
the last day that comes before the weekend. It is a day of
fun and relaxation to me. I
understood the punchline automatically and found it clever
because of the way that the
words were switched. I also enjoy going to TGIF restaurant;
it is my favorite place to eat!
The punchline was funny to me and I enjoyed it the most. My
second favorite is the SDS
about the panda. I agreed with the rest of the class how
they saw it to be funny. The third
favorite is the SDS about Nate the snake. I have used the
phrase “Better late than never”
but I do not find any other connection to it. My fourth
favorite is the story about the chess
players. I like to sing the song “Chestnuts roasting by an
open fire” and I love Christmas
time. The least favorite was the SDS about friars. I
completely agreed with the classes
conclusions of this SDS. I noticed a connection that the
Shaggy Dog Stories had. Each
story gave some background on a person or a particular group
of people and at the end
they all had punchlines. All of the endings of the stories
were cleverly worded and some
were even spelled differently than the actual phrase people
use. For example, in the
punchline that stated “Only Hugh can prevent florist friars”
words sounded almost the
same as they do in the original phrase which is “Only you
can prevent forest fires”.
Some of the SDS involved some type of violence.
|
Violence
Level
|
|
Panda
|
H
|
|
Friars
|
H
|
|
Chess
|
M
|
|
Nate
|
L
|
|
Friday
|
N
|
|
H= High Violence
M= Medium Violence
L= Less Violence
N= No Violence
The cartoon SDS were about the panda and Nate. The SDS about
the panda was the most
violent because the punchline involved shooting. The SDS
about Nate hardly included
any violence. The SDS about friars, chess, and Friday were
realistic and only the SDS
about Friday included no violence.
Three of the SDS included real people and two of them used animals as
the
main character.
|
Animal/Real
Person
|
Dialogue
|
Panda
|
A
|
Y
|
Friday
|
R
|
Y
|
Nate
|
A
|
N
|
Friars
|
R
|
N
|
Chess
|
R
|
Y
|
A= Animal
Y=Yes
R= Real Person
N=No
The panda was the only animal with dialogue. In the SDS
about the chess players, the
hotel manager had dialogue but the chess players did not.
After reading the SDS in class, it
has made me interested in reading more of
them. I have introduced them to people in my family and some
friends and they enjoyed
reading most of the stories. I definitely see myself
continuing to read the Shaggy Dog
Stories in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment